Data-Backed · Win Rates
Green Commanders
Green commanders have a 24.83% win rate across 19,054 games tracked in the last 180 days on Playgroup.gg, below the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
98
Ranked
19,054
Games
Win Rate
24.83%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
19,054
Last 180 Days
Avg Game Length
2h 3m
8.2 rounds
Commanders
98
With 25+ games
Win Conditions
Green commanders most commonly win through Combat (68.0% of wins) across 19,054 tracked games.
Combat
68.0%
Commander Damage
14.9%
Combo
5.4%
Poison
4.5%
Non Combat Damage
3.4%
Alternative
2.9%
Mill
1.0%
Game Concentration
15 commanders account for 50% of all Green games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
15
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
257 of 468 Green commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
54.9%
Coverage
257 played
468 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Green Commanders by Win Rate
98
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 39.17% | 90 | ~ | |
| 2 | S | 39.0% | 25 | NEW | |
| 3 | S | 38.38% | 271 | ▲+16.16% | |
| 4 | S | 36.25% | 40 | NEW | |
| 5 | A | 34.87% | 280 | NEW | |
| 6 | A | 33.93% | 42 | NEW | |
| 7 | A | 32.86% | 175 | ~ | |
| 8 | A | 32.84% | 67 | NEW | |
| 9 | A | 31.72% | 67 | ▼-8.28% | |
| 10 | A | 30.91% | 55 | NEW | |
| 11 | A | 30.3% | 257 | ~ | |
| 12 | A | 30.25% | 119 | ▲+4.65% | |
| 13 | A | 30.02% | 759 | ▼-4.72% | |
| 14 | B | 29.84% | 31 | NEW | |
| 15 | B | 29.36% | 86 | ▲+7.87% | |
| 16 | B | 29.27% | 82 | ▼-4.82% | |
| 17 | B | 29.26% | 983 | NEW | |
| 18 | B | 28.9% | 417 | ~ | |
| 19 | B | 28.74% | 87 | ▲+5.62% | |
| 20 | B | 28.72% | 37 | ▼-6.13% | |
| 21 | B | 28.57% | 91 | ▲+4.04% | |
| 22 | B | 28.4% | 184 | ▲+4.74% | |
| 23 | B | 28.33% | 30 | NEW | |
| 24 | B | 27.78% | 72 | ▼-3.62% | |
| 25 | B | 27.75% | 505 | ~ | |
| 26 | B | 27.71% | 129 | ▲+6.74% | |
| 27 | B | 27.48% | 136 | ▼-3.41% | |
| 28 | B | 27.09% | 479 | ▼-5.42% | |
| 29 | B | 26.55% | 194 | ~ | |
| 30 | B | 26.39% | 36 | ▲+18.3% | |
| 31 | B | 26.29% | 524 | NEW | |
| 32 | B | 26.22% | 41 | NEW | |
| 33 | B | 25.87% | 172 | NEW | |
| 34 | B | 25.81% | 247 | ~ | |
| 35 | B | 25.72% | 954 | ~ | |
| 36 | B | 25.15% | 1743 | ~ | |
| 37 | B | 25.0% | 399 | ~ | |
| 38 | B | 25.0% | 99 | NEW | |
| 39 | B | 25.0% | 38 | ▼-17.68% | |
| 40 | B | 24.78% | 114 | ▲+14.58% | |
| 41 | B | 24.65% | 792 | ~ | |
| 42 | B | 24.64% | 173 | ~ | |
| 43 | B | 24.51% | 102 | NEW | |
| 44 | B | 24.4% | 357 | ~ | |
| 45 | B | 24.35% | 77 | ~ | |
| 46 | B | 24.02% | 51 | ▼-15.75% | |
| 47 | B | 23.68% | 57 | ▼-6.32% | |
| 48 | B | 23.61% | 803 | NEW | |
| 49 | B | 23.48% | 66 | ~ | |
| 50 | B | 23.33% | 30 | NEW | |
| 51 | B | 23.33% | 30 | NEW | |
| 52 | B | 23.2% | 194 | ~ | |
| 53 | B | 23.1% | 92 | ▼-16.24% | |
| 54 | C | 22.63% | 438 | ▼-4.03% | |
| 55 | C | 22.43% | 301 | ~ | |
| 56 | C | 22.32% | 28 | ▲+10.28% | |
| 57 | C | 22.31% | 65 | ▼-5.73% | |
| 58 | C | 22.02% | 42 | NEW | |
| 59 | C | 21.94% | 253 | ▲+3.32% | |
| 60 | C | 21.83% | 134 | ▼-6.23% | |
| 61 | C | 21.76% | 54 | ▲+5.09% | |
| 62 | C | 21.43% | 28 | ▼-5.4% | |
| 63 | C | 21.36% | 103 | ~ | |
| 64 | C | 21.33% | 398 | ~ | |
| 65 | C | 21.31% | 176 | NEW | |
| 66 | C | 21.2% | 349 | ~ | |
| 67 | C | 20.97% | 31 | NEW | |
| 68 | C | 20.93% | 86 | NEW | |
| 69 | C | 20.92% | 153 | ~ | |
| 70 | C | 20.73% | 41 | NEW | |
| 71 | C | 20.64% | 109 | ▼-3.85% | |
| 72 | C | 20.59% | 68 | ▼-3.02% | |
| 73 | C | 19.81% | 405 | ~ | |
| 74 | C | 19.57% | 46 | ~ | |
| 75 | C | 19.5% | 50 | ▼-6.08% | |
| 76 | C | 19.39% | 127 | ~ | |
| 77 | C | 19.3% | 57 | ▼-11.47% | |
| 78 | C | 19.0% | 50 | ▼-7.25% | |
| 79 | C | 18.8% | 693 | ~ | |
| 80 | C | 18.38% | 34 | NEW | |
| 81 | D | 17.41% | 237 | ▼-10.72% | |
| 82 | D | 17.38% | 100 | NEW | |
| 83 | D | 17.17% | 99 | ~ | |
| 84 | D | 17.05% | 44 | NEW | |
| 85 | D | 17.0% | 25 | ~ | |
| 86 | D | 16.96% | 28 | NEW | |
| 87 | D | 16.95% | 146 | ▼-7.39% | |
| 88 | D | 16.04% | 152 | ▼-10.35% | |
| 89 | D | 15.91% | 55 | NEW | |
| 90 | D | 15.52% | 29 | NEW | |
| 91 | D | 15.46% | 38 | ▼-8.78% | |
| 92 | D | 14.88% | 42 | ▼-4.41% | |
| 93 | D | 14.84% | 32 | NEW | |
| 94 | D | 13.33% | 30 | NEW | |
| 95 | D | 12.5% | 26 | NEW | |
| 96 | D | 11.67% | 30 | ▼-5.6% | |
| 97 | D | 10.0% | 30 | NEW | |
| 98 | D | 8.87% | 31 | NEW |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Green
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Green commanders?
Green commanders have a 24.83% win rate across 19,054 tracked casual Commander games in the last 180 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Green commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 98 Green commanders with at least 25 recorded games and at least 5 distinct registered pilots in the last 180 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Green commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Green data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 180 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: