Data-Backed · Win Rates
Green Commanders
Green commanders have a 25.78% win rate across 7,592 games tracked in the last 90 days on Playgroup.gg, above the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
86
Ranked
7,592
Games
Win Rate
25.78%
vs 25% expected
Games Tracked
7,592
Last 90 Days
Avg Game Length
1h 47m
8.2 rounds
Commanders
86
With 15+ games
Win Conditions
Green commanders most commonly win through Combat (68.4% of wins) across 7,592 tracked games.
Combat
68.4%
Commander Damage
13.9%
Combo
5.7%
Non Combat Damage
3.8%
Poison
3.6%
Alternative
3.4%
Mill
1.2%
Game Concentration
15 commanders account for 50% of all Green games. The curve shows how games are distributed from the most-played to the least-played commander.
15
50% Coverage
Loading...
Commander Coverage
213 of 412 Green commanders have appeared in at least one tracked game.
51.7%
Coverage
213 played
412 total
Trending Commanders
Rankings
Green Commanders by Win Rate
86
Entries
| # | Tier | Win Rate | Games | Trend | Commander |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | 42.93% | 46 | ▲+7.93% | |
| 2 | S | 37.11% | 64 | NEW | |
| 3 | S | 35.23% | 22 | NEW | |
| 4 | S | 35.1% | 26 | ▲+3.43% | |
| 5 | S | 35.0% | 15 | NEW | |
| 6 | A | 34.81% | 107 | ▲+8.14% | |
| 7 | A | 34.25% | 73 | ▲+12.37% | |
| 8 | A | 33.33% | 81 | ▲+6.96% | |
| 9 | A | 32.56% | 86 | ▲+9.47% | |
| 10 | A | 32.35% | 17 | ▲+6.71% | |
| 11 | A | 32.07% | 46 | NEW | |
| 12 | A | 31.64% | 510 | NEW | |
| 13 | A | 31.41% | 39 | NEW | |
| 14 | A | 30.89% | 386 | ~ | |
| 15 | A | 30.8% | 56 | ~ | |
| 16 | A | 30.77% | 39 | NEW | |
| 17 | A | 30.65% | 62 | ▲+11.9% | |
| 18 | A | 30.0% | 20 | ▼-10.18% | |
| 19 | B | 29.49% | 170 | ▲+5.4% | |
| 20 | B | 29.44% | 45 | ▲+9.44% | |
| 21 | B | 29.41% | 17 | NEW | |
| 22 | B | 29.17% | 18 | ▼-13.89% | |
| 23 | B | 28.71% | 182 | ~ | |
| 24 | B | 28.64% | 55 | NEW | |
| 25 | B | 28.38% | 37 | ▼-5.62% | |
| 26 | B | 28.18% | 181 | ▲+11.29% | |
| 27 | B | 27.92% | 120 | ~ | |
| 28 | B | 27.38% | 231 | ▲+3.65% | |
| 29 | B | 27.27% | 33 | NEW | |
| 30 | B | 26.84% | 393 | ~ | |
| 31 | B | 26.79% | 42 | ▼-24.1% | |
| 32 | B | 26.76% | 71 | ~ | |
| 33 | B | 26.71% | 73 | ▲+8.02% | |
| 34 | B | 26.67% | 15 | NEW | |
| 35 | B | 26.19% | 63 | ▼-11.02% | |
| 36 | B | 26.09% | 23 | ▼-6.95% | |
| 37 | B | 25.99% | 252 | ▼-9.1% | |
| 38 | B | 25.97% | 180 | ▲+3.41% | |
| 39 | B | 25.96% | 444 | ▲+4.72% | |
| 40 | B | 25.68% | 37 | ▲+6.81% | |
| 41 | B | 25.64% | 352 | ~ | |
| 42 | B | 25.54% | 139 | NEW | |
| 43 | B | 25.44% | 170 | ▲+5.77% | |
| 44 | B | 25.0% | 16 | NEW | |
| 45 | B | 25.0% | 27 | ▼-14.29% | |
| 46 | B | 25.0% | 36 | ~ | |
| 47 | B | 25.0% | 17 | NEW | |
| 48 | B | 24.11% | 28 | ▼-7.83% | |
| 49 | B | 24.02% | 51 | ▼-3.71% | |
| 50 | B | 23.68% | 19 | NEW | |
| 51 | B | 23.66% | 56 | ▼-13.84% | |
| 52 | B | 23.65% | 37 | NEW | |
| 53 | B | 23.57% | 122 | ▲+3.09% | |
| 54 | B | 23.49% | 83 | ▼-11.21% | |
| 55 | B | 23.47% | 49 | NEW | |
| 56 | B | 23.31% | 133 | ▼-5.78% | |
| 57 | B | 23.28% | 29 | NEW | |
| 58 | B | 23.17% | 41 | ▼-3.86% | |
| 59 | B | 23.03% | 127 | ~ | |
| 60 | C | 21.8% | 164 | ▲+4.92% | |
| 61 | C | 20.42% | 60 | ▼-13.96% | |
| 62 | C | 20.21% | 47 | NEW | |
| 63 | C | 20.0% | 30 | NEW | |
| 64 | C | 19.11% | 276 | ~ | |
| 65 | C | 18.85% | 61 | ▼-8.38% | |
| 66 | C | 18.67% | 83 | ~ | |
| 67 | C | 18.52% | 54 | ▼-10.89% | |
| 68 | C | 18.52% | 27 | NEW | |
| 69 | C | 18.48% | 23 | NEW | |
| 70 | C | 18.15% | 84 | ~ | |
| 71 | D | 17.86% | 28 | ▼-19.64% | |
| 72 | D | 17.86% | 21 | NEW | |
| 73 | D | 17.14% | 35 | ▼-6.47% | |
| 74 | D | 17.05% | 44 | ▼-8.59% | |
| 75 | D | 16.38% | 29 | ~ | |
| 76 | D | 16.36% | 55 | ~ | |
| 77 | D | 16.18% | 17 | NEW | |
| 78 | D | 14.13% | 23 | NEW | |
| 79 | D | 14.13% | 23 | ▼-6.18% | |
| 80 | D | 14.04% | 57 | ~ | |
| 81 | D | 13.89% | 18 | NEW | |
| 82 | D | 13.28% | 32 | NEW | |
| 83 | D | 13.16% | 19 | NEW | |
| 84 | D | 11.84% | 19 | NEW | |
| 85 | D | 10.83% | 15 | ▼-4.65% | |
| 86 | D | 7.69% | 26 | NEW |
Faded win rates indicate low sample size (fewer than 50 games). Rankings may shift as more data is collected.
Explore
Contains Green
Frequently Asked
What is the win rate for Green commanders?
Green commanders have a 25.78% win rate across 7,592 tracked casual Commander games in the last 90 days on Playgroup.gg. The 4-player expected baseline is 25%.
How many Green commanders are tracked?
Playgroup.gg tracks 86 Green commanders with at least 15 recorded games and at least 4 distinct registered pilots in the last 90 days. The pilot diversity floor stops a single grinder from skewing the ranking with their pet deck.
How are Green commander rankings calculated?
Rankings use pod-size-normalized win rates from games tracked through the Playgroup.gg app. A win in a 2-player game and a win in a 5-player game are weighted fairly against the 25% expected baseline for 4-player Commander.
How often is the Green data updated?
Stats refresh every 6 hours. The last 90 days window means rankings shift gradually as new games are recorded and older games age out of the window.
Last updated: