Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
Global Commander StatsSummary
Lumra, Bellow of the Woods is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 1,404 recorded Playgroup games, winning 38% of them (535–869) at an Elo of 1,636, ranking #261 globally.
Wins average 7 turns, with 347818 damage dealt and 0.7 player kills per game on average.
Frequently asked
What is Lumra, Bellow of the Woods's win rate? ▾
Lumra, Bellow of the Woods has a 38% win rate across 1404 recorded Playgroup games (535 wins, 869 losses).
How long do winning games with Lumra, Bellow of the Woods take? ▾
Wins with Lumra, Bellow of the Woods take on average 7 turns. Total tracked play time: 21 days.
How many decks use Lumra, Bellow of the Woods? ▾
275 decks list Lumra, Bellow of the Woods as their commander on Playgroup, of which 184 have played at least one recorded game.
Global Elo Trend
Commander Popularity Trend
Misc. Stats
Top 5 Public Decks
| Rank | Elo | User | No. games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1662 | Lucas | 8 | 6 |
| 2 | 1611 | 500squirrels | 9 | 5 |
| 3 | 1609 | vvathing | 9 | 7 |
| 4 | 1590 | Schusta | 44 | 17 |
| 5 | 1579 | Cervs | 22 | 7 |
How does this commander win?
When Lumra, Bellow of the Woods wins, 34.79% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Does seating order matter?
Lumra, Bellow of the Woods wins 45.91% of games from position 1 and 25.0% from position 6 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Lumra, Bellow of the Woods wins 37.94% after 0 mulligans and 0.0% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Lumra, Bellow of the Woods 3.84/5 on average, across 796 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Lumra, Bellow of the Woods wins, opponents flag the game as salty 56.4% of the time across 551 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Lumra, Bellow of the Woods. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.
