Summary
Raffine, Scheming Seer is a Magic: The Gathering commander tracked across 2,237 recorded Playgroup games, winning 34% of them (771–1463) at an Elo of 1,693, ranking #72 globally.
Wins average 9 turns, with 5 damage dealt and 0.75 player kills per game on average.
Frequently Asked
What is Raffine, Scheming Seer's win rate?
How long do winning games with Raffine, Scheming Seer take?
How many decks use Raffine, Scheming Seer?
Global Elo trend
Commander popularity trend
Misc. stats
Top 5 public decks
| Rank | Elo | User | Games | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1667 | abdbla | 30 | 15 |
| 2 | 1629 | Zach | 12 | 6 |
| 3 | 1580 | PapaTriste | 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 1570 | Gidi | 8 | 4 |
| 5 | 1559 | AbbathTheMighty | 2 | 2 |
How does this commander win?
When Raffine, Scheming Seer wins, 74.33% of wins come via combat across tracked games with a recorded win condition.
Staples that win games for Raffine, Scheming Seer
Cards that raise this deck's measured win rate the most, compared with Raffine, Scheming Seer decks that leave them out.
| # | Card | Lift Win-rate lift |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+13.8 pp |
| 2 |
|
+5.4 pp |
| 3 |
|
+3.4 pp |
| 4 |
|
+2.8 pp |
| 5 |
|
+0.6 pp |
| 6 |
|
+0.4 pp |
Measured win-rate lift against decks on the same commander without the card, ranked by the 95% lower bound. How this is measured
Does seating order matter?
Raffine, Scheming Seer wins 44.24% of games from position 1 and 17.65% from position 5 across tracked games.
Do mulligans hurt this commander?
Across tracked games, Raffine, Scheming Seer wins 33.41% after 0 mulligans and 33.33% after 5 mulligans.
How do players rate games with this commander?
Pilot rating
Pilots rate their own games with Raffine, Scheming Seer 3.8/5 on average, across 1393 self-reports.
Opponent salt
When Raffine, Scheming Seer wins, opponents flag the game as salty 62.6% of the time across 787 tracked wins.
Best and worst matchups
Opposing commanders with at least ten tracked games against Raffine, Scheming Seer. Pairs with fewer than 25 games are shown in italics; treat those as suggestive, not statistical.